Syndicated data and retailer feeds are only worth what you can actually do with them, and most of it comes with confidentiality strings attached. Nera lets your team ask real questions without tripping them.
Numbers from independent research on AI-assisted analytics adoption, not a Nera-specific claim, but a real starting point for the math on your own team.
The most useful category data is also the most contractually restricted.
Retail and syndicated data agreements strictly limit use and disclosure. A general AI tool doesn't know your contract exists.
Category benchmarking only works if no one's brand-level or retailer-level figures leak to the others in the room, including inside an AI model.
Flavor, size, format, claims, getting category data aligned and clean before analysis even starts is still mostly manual.
Fair question. Here's the answer, no dodge.
Admin controls, a zero-retention agreement, a contract that says your data won't be used to train the model. Real protections. But the model still receives your category and pricing data in a readable form, every safeguard is a promise about what happens after that.
The model never receives your category and pricing data in a readable form, not under a policy, by architecture. There's no promise to trust, because there's nothing exposed to begin with.
You're not alone, plenty of teams skip the enterprise conversation and use the tools they already have. Nera runs in the same kind of chat interface, nothing new to learn. Just add the one thing that was missing.
Per-seat sticker prices don't matter if you can't buy at that seat count. Here's the real annual cost to cover an 8-person team doing this actual job, sustained analytical work, not casual chat, control plane included.
Figures based on an 8-person team doing sustained analytical work. Usage estimates drawn from published heavy-workload benchmarks for comparable AI usage patterns, actual costs vary by vendor and usage pattern, confirm current rates directly with each vendor.
Even at the top of any Enterprise contract, ChatGPT and Claude still receive your data in a readable form, that's true whether you're paying $8,000 a year or $150,000. More spend buys better controls around the data. It doesn't change whether the model sees it. Full data isolation, residency, and sovereignty, the actual requirement across regulated industries and regulated markets, isn't a pricing tier anyone else sells at any price. Nera includes it by default, and doesn't charge a premium to do it.
See the full pricing page for what's included at each tier.
Nera is working directly with CPG brands on exactly this problem today.